Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 3.53B vs. PTFAX (456M). PTFAX pays higher dividends than CBHIX: PTFAX (6.14) vs CBHIX (3.61). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (14 years) vs PTFAX (18 years). PTFAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 867.00 vs. CBHIX (60.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). PTFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.86 vs. CBHIX (13.45). PTFAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.94 vs. CBHIX (20.80).
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.50 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.50 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.753 | 16.645 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 456M | 774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 6.14 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 19.86 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.59 | 22.45 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.80 | 27.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.76 | 14.23 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement