Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs SMNAX
CBHIX vs SMNAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs SMNAX
CBHIX vs SMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. SMNAX (104M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than SMNAX: CBHIX (3.76) vs SMNAX (2.26). CBHIX was incepted earlier than SMNAX: CBHIX (14 years) vs SMNAX (5 years). SMNAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). SMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CBHIX (60.00). SMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: SMNAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. SMNAX (1.36).
| CBHIX | SMNAX | CBHIX / SMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.44 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.093 | 1.322 | 688% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 104M | 3,093% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 2.26 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 1.36 | 703% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.83 | 4.54 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.35 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement