Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs SMNAX
CBHIX vs SMNAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs SMNAX
CBHIX vs SMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. SMNAX (109M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than SMNAX: CBHIX (3.63) vs SMNAX (2.22). CBHIX was incepted earlier than SMNAX: CBHIX (14 years) vs SMNAX (5 years). SMNAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). SMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CBHIX (60.00). SMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: SMNAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. SMNAX (7.81).
| CBHIX | SMNAX | CBHIX / SMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.44 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.858 | 2.314 | 383% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 109M | 3,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 2.22 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | 7.81 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.15 | 12.26 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.09 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement