Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs SMNAX
CBHMX vs SMNAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs SMNAX
CBHMX vs SMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. SMNAX (110M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than SMNAX: CBHMX (3.53) vs SMNAX (2.22). CBHMX was incepted earlier than SMNAX: CBHMX (6 years) vs SMNAX (5 years). SMNAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.74). SMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CBHMX (60.00). SMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHMX: SMNAX (1000) vs CBHMX (3000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. SMNAX (8.20).
| CBHMX | SMNAX | CBHMX / SMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 2.44 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.44 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.336 | 2.681 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 110M | 2,996% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.22 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 8.20 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.49 | 12.33 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.56 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement