Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs SMNAX
CBHMX vs SMNAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs SMNAX
CBHMX vs SMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. SMNAX (106M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than SMNAX: CBHMX (3.66) vs SMNAX (2.26). CBHMX was incepted earlier than SMNAX: CBHMX (6 years) vs SMNAX (5 years). SMNAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.74). SMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CBHMX (60.00). SMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHMX: SMNAX (1000) vs CBHMX (3000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. SMNAX (1.79).
| CBHMX | SMNAX | CBHMX / SMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 2.44 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.44 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.980 | 1.322 | 679% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 106M | 3,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 2.26 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.22 | 1.79 | 514% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.82 | 9.17 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.93 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement