Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs CLBFX
CBLAX vs CLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs CLBFX
CBLAX vs CLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. CLBFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Hold and CLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: CLBFX (1.92) vs CBLAX (1.51). CBLAX was incepted earlier than CLBFX: CBLAX (24 years) vs CLBFX (24 years). CBLAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: CLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.80 vs. CBLAX (8.26). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.51 vs. CBLAX (15.62).
| CBLAX | CLBFX | CBLAX / CLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.470 | 8.964 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.92 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.26 | 13.80 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.44 | 43.39 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.62 | 37.51 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.48 | 103.69 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement