Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$56.42
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. CBLAX (10.1B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.53) vs RLBAX (1.08). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. CBLAX (4.86). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. CBLAX (23.59).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.917 | 13.298 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 263B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 8.15 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.17 | 38.05 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.59 | 34.46 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.54 | 63.50 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement