Ad is loading...
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$48.82
Change+$0.54 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.92B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.94
Change+$0.34 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLAX (8.92B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.27). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. CBLAX (-1.43). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.50 vs. CBLAX (24.60).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.33 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.33 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.666 | -4.026 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.27 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.43 | 0.86 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 10.01 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 28.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | 37.45 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...