Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$51.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.57B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.69B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. CBLAX (9.57B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.28). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. CBLAX (2.68). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. CBLAX (30.34).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.857 | 1.685 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.57B | 238B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.28 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 3.94 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.26 | 20.37 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 33.77 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.36 | 46.09 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers