Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$52.53
Change-$0.49 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.61B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. CBLAX (9.61B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.77) vs RLBAX (1.23). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. CBLAX (1.39). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. CBLAX (28.73).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.638 | 4.085 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.61B | 244B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.23 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 4.45 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.48 | 30.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.73 | 34.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.75 | 51.23 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement