Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$56.90
Change-$0.15 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.31B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CBLAX (10.3B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.56) vs RLBAX (1.10). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. CBLAX (7.86). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. CBLAX (29.50).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.375 | 13.770 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.10 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 9.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.00 | 47.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.50 | 38.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.37 | 68.72 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement