Ad is loading...
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$49.17
Change-$1.44 (-2.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.17
Change-$0.87 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.03B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 235B vs. CBLAX (9.42B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.27). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). CBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. RLBAX (0.57). CBLAX (42.98) and RLBAX (41.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.33 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.33 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.113 | -2.348 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 235B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.27 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 0.57 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.66 | 7.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.98 | 41.60 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.17 | 41.83 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...