Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.52) vs RLBAX (1.12). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (24 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.91). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. CBLAX (3.92). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.55 vs. CBLAX (16.55).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.374 | 8.046 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.12 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 5.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.74 | 41.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.55 | 28.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.79 | 73.50 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement