Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$55.63
Change-$0.16 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.09B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. CBLAX (10.1B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (2.08) vs CBLAX (1.63). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. CBLAX (6.10). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. CBLAX (27.15).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.123 | 9.922 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 256B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.08 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 8.29 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.74 | 30.56 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.15 | 39.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.08 | 69.21 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement