Ad is loading...
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$48.82
Change+$0.54 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.92B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.33
Change+$0.35 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. CBLAX (8.92B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (2.26) vs CBLAX (1.83). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. CBLAX (-1.43). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.28 vs. CBLAX (24.60).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.30 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.30 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.666 | -3.733 | 152% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.43 | 1.94 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 12.83 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 34.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.44 | 45.85 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...