Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$56.90
Change-$0.15 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.31B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.00
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CBLAX (10.3B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (2.00) vs CBLAX (1.56). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. CBLAX (7.86). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.24 vs. CBLAX (29.50).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.375 | 14.654 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 2.00 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 10.30 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.00 | 52.37 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.50 | 44.24 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.37 | 79.97 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement