Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$51.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.57B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.97
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.69B
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. CBLAX (9.57B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (2.26) vs CBLAX (1.83). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. CBLAX (2.68). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.77 vs. CBLAX (30.34).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.857 | 2.075 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.57B | 238B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 5.05 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.26 | 23.43 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 39.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.36 | 55.01 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement