Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CBLAX (1.51). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (24 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBLAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. CBLAX (8.26). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.36 vs. CBLAX (15.62).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.470 | 9.027 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.26 | 13.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.44 | 44.03 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.62 | 36.36 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.48 | 92.43 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement