Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBFX
CBLCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBFX
CBLCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. CBLCX (10.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CBLCX (0.84). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLCX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBLCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. CBLCX (13.12). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.10 vs. CBLCX (14.99).
| CBLCX | RLBFX | CBLCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.30 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.30 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.333 | 9.817 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 279B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 2.02 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.12 | 18.07 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.04 | 46.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.99 | 37.10 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.60 | 89.73 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement