Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs FFMMX
CBLSX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs FFMMX
CBLSX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CBLSX (151M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: FFMMX (1.67) vs CBLSX (0.99). CBLSX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CBLSX (22 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CBLSX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: FFMMX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. CBLSX (4.95). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. CBLSX (-30.04).
| CBLSX | FFMMX | CBLSX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.36 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.36 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.545 | 6.807 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 10.97 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.10 | 37.51 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.04 | 40.62 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNCSX | 13.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Mercer Non-US Core Equity I | |||
| HNCYX | 25.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford International Growth Y | |||
| RTXSX | 15.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets S | |||
| IGIUX | 137.16 | -0.27 | -0.20% |
| Integrity Growth & Income Fund C | |||
| FEEFX | 103.07 | -0.57 | -0.55% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-3 | |||