It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.47% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.78%.
CBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
IOSP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
CBT | IOSP | CBT / IOSP | |
Capitalization | 5.11B | 3.21B | 159% |
EBITDA | 701M | 201M | 349% |
Gain YTD | 31.882 | -2.767 | -1,152% |
P/E Ratio | 12.08 | 22.73 | 53% |
Revenue | 3.92B | 1.95B | 201% |
Total Cash | 244M | 204M | 120% |
Total Debt | 1.31B | 45.2M | 2,903% |
CBT | IOSP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IOSP's Valuation (63) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CBT (67) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to CBT’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOSP (42) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's SMR Rating (25) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOSP (62) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOSP (66) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
CBT | IOSP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago64% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago71% | 2 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 5 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOSP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IOSP | 100% | +0.08% | ||
FUL - IOSP | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
SCL - IOSP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
AVNT - IOSP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
MTX - IOSP | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
CBT - IOSP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More |