CBTTF vs MATEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBTTF is a Hold and MATEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBTTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMATEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBTTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MATEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CBTTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +18.40% price change this week, while MATEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +17.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +133.04%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.61% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| CBTTF | MATEF | CBTTF / MATEF | |
| Capitalization | 15.6M | 2.85M | 547% |
| EBITDA | -32.79M | -239.14K | 13,711% |
| Gain YTD | -34.222 | -67.146 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.25 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.72M | 357K | 2,162% |
| Total Cash | 3.45M | 330K | 1,046% |
| Total Debt | 19.3M | 123K | 15,691% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CBTTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBTTF and BITF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBTTF and BITF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBTTF | 100% | +17.00% | ||
| BITF - CBTTF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| ABTS - CBTTF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CYFRF - CBTTF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
| DMGGF - CBTTF | 24% Poorly correlated | +8.19% | ||
| MARA - CBTTF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||
MATEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MATEF and WULF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATEF and WULF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATEF | 100% | +14.12% | ||
| WULF - MATEF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| IREN - MATEF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| BTM - MATEF | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.92% | ||
| MEGL - MATEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CBTTF - MATEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +17.00% | ||
More | ||||