Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CBVZX vs FTCWX
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs FTCWX
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
Price$13.50
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. FTCWX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and FTCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX has more cash in the bank: 5.27B vs. CBVZX (157M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: CBVZX (3.53) vs FTCWX (2.18). CBVZX was incepted earlier than FTCWX: CBVZX (14 years) vs FTCWX (18 years). FTCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CBVZX (17.00). FTCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: FTCWX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FTCWX (8.96). FTCWX return over 5 years is better than : 6.56 vs. CBVZX (2.53).
| CBVZX | FTCWX | CBVZX / FTCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.746 | 4.496 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 5.27B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.18 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 8.96 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.70 | -3.13 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.53 | 6.56 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.42 | 8.54 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers