Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs FTCWX
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs FTCWX
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.91M
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
Price$14.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. FTCWX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and FTCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX has more cash in the bank: 5.61B vs. CBVZX (153M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: CBVZX (3.29) vs FTCWX (2.14). CBVZX was incepted earlier than FTCWX: CBVZX (15 years) vs FTCWX (19 years). FTCWX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.69). FTCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CBVZX (7.00). FTCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: FTCWX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. FTCWX (6.45). FTCWX return over 5 years is better than : 7.76 vs. CBVZX (6.51).
| CBVZX | FTCWX | CBVZX / FTCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.52 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.52 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.307 | 7.111 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 5.61B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.14 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 6.45 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.42 | 16.91 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.51 | 7.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.36 | 20.46 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement