Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs FTCWX
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs FTCWX
CBVZX vs FTCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. FTCWX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and FTCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. CBVZX (149M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: CBVZX (3.47) vs FTCWX (2.07). CBVZX was incepted earlier than FTCWX: CBVZX (16 years) vs FTCWX (20 years). FTCWX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.71). CBVZX (31.00) and FTCWX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: FTCWX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.10 vs. FTCWX (9.45). FTCWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.26 vs. CBVZX (7.55).
| CBVZX | FTCWX | CBVZX / FTCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.51 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.53 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 3.958 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 6.32B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 2.07 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.10 | 9.45 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.18 | 21.65 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.55 | 10.26 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.58 | 28.09 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement