Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs FTDWX
CBVZX vs FTDWX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs FTDWX
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.09M
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$14.29
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57B
CBVZX vs FTDWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. FTDWX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and FTDWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. CBVZX (154M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: CBVZX (3.33) vs FTDWX (2.64). CBVZX was incepted earlier than FTDWX: CBVZX (15 years) vs FTDWX (19 years). FTDWX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.69). FTDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CBVZX (7.00). FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: FTDWX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. FTDWX (6.58). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 12.22 vs. CBVZX (7.94).
| CBVZX | FTDWX | CBVZX / FTDWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.02 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.02 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.419 | 7.637 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 5.57B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 2.64 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 6.58 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 21.31 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.94 | 12.22 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.88 | 27.18 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers