Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs FTDWX
CBVZX vs FTDWX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs FTDWX
CBVZX vs FTDWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. FTDWX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and FTDWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTDWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. CBVZX (149M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than FTDWX: CBVZX (3.47) vs FTDWX (2.55). CBVZX was incepted earlier than FTDWX: CBVZX (16 years) vs FTDWX (20 years). FTDWX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.71). CBVZX (31.00) and FTDWX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTDWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: FTDWX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX (10.52) and FTDWX (10.03) have marching annual gain over last year. FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 13.10 vs. CBVZX (7.25).
| CBVZX | FTDWX | CBVZX / FTDWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.01 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.580 | 4.147 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 6.32B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 2.55 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 10.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.05 | 23.54 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.25 | 13.10 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.45 | 34.68 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement