Ad is loading...
CBVZX vs PACAX
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs PACAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. PACAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 579M vs. CBVZX (156M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than PACAX: CBVZX (3.53) vs PACAX (2.18). CBVZX was incepted earlier than PACAX: CBVZX (14 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 456.00 vs. CBVZX (17.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: PACAX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. CBVZX (7.84). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.94 vs. CBVZX (2.74).
| CBVZX | PACAX | CBVZX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.892 | 11.150 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 579M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.18 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 12.14 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.31 | 1.77 | -187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.74 | 11.94 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.42 | 22.75 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers