Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs PACAX
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs PACAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv Inst
Price$9.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.23M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.37M
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 580M vs. CBVZX (154M). PACAX (3.40) and CBVZX (3.34) have matching dividends . CBVZX was incepted earlier than PACAX: CBVZX (15 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.69). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. CBVZX (7.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: PACAX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.79 vs. PACAX (5.93). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.43 vs. CBVZX (8.49).
| CBVZX | PACAX | CBVZX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.227 | 8.962 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 580M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 3.40 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 5.93 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.36 | 24.40 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.49 | 12.43 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.39 | 29.71 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement