Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBVZX vs PACAX
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts CBVZX vs PACAX
CBVZX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBVZX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVZX is a Hold and PACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 845M vs. CBVZX (149M). CBVZX pays higher dividends than PACAX: CBVZX (3.47) vs PACAX (3.05). CBVZX was incepted earlier than PACAX: CBVZX (16 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CBVZX (0.71). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. CBVZX (31.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBVZX: PACAX (0) vs CBVZX (2000). CBVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. PACAX (9.77). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.60 vs. CBVZX (7.25).
| CBVZX | PACAX | CBVZX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.96 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.580 | 3.783 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 845M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 3.05 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 9.77 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.05 | 29.72 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.25 | 9.60 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.45 | 40.84 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers