Advertisement
CBZ vs TDS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBZ is a Buy and TDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CBZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +3.92% price change this week, while TDS (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
TDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (+3.51% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Major Telecommunications (+2.56% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CBZ | TDS | CBZ / TDS | |
| Capitalization | 1.89B | 4.57B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 418M | 783M | 53% |
| Gain YTD | -30.109 | -1.983 | 1,519% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.83 | 23.62 | 59% |
| Revenue | 2.77B | 1.25B | 222% |
| Total Cash | 28.7M | 1.37B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 1.99B | 1.26B | 159% |
CBZ | TDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBZ's Valuation (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TDS (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBZ (98) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBZ’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's SMR Rating (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TDS (91) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TDS (58) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as TDS (99) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
| CBZ | TDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 55% | 17 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IYK | 73.88 | 0.51 | +0.70% |
| iShares US Consumer Staples ETF | |||
| MPRO | 32.66 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Monarch ProCap ETF | |||
| GJS | 23.51 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group | |||
| HFSI | 35.23 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Hartford Strategic Income ETF | |||
| VNAM | 24.26 | -0.43 | -1.74% |
| Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | |||
TDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDS has been loosely correlated with AD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDS jumps, then AD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDS | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| AD - TDS | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| VOD - TDS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| SHEN - TDS | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| LBTYK - TDS | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.45% | ||
| IHS - TDS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||