Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCALX vs NRGSX
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CCALX vs NRGSX
Conestoga Small Cap Institutional
Price$68.98
Change-$0.13 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.11B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCALX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCALX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. CCALX (3.11B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CCALX: NRGSX (0.07) vs CCALX (0.00). CCALX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CCALX (11 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CCALX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CCALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCALX: NRGSX (0) vs CCALX (250000). NRGSX (-14.54) and CCALX (-14.77) have marching annual gain over last year. CCALX return over 5 years is better than : -2.87 vs. NRGSX (-10.73).
| CCALX | NRGSX | CCALX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.74 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.069 | -7.544 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 8.2B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.77 | -14.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.96 | -4.05 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.87 | -10.73 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 3.75 | 2,406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement