Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCALX vs NRGSX
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CCALX vs NRGSX
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCALX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCALX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. CCALX (2.03B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CCALX: NRGSX (0.47) vs CCALX (0.00). CCALX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CCALX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CCALX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCALX (17.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCALX: NRGSX (0) vs CCALX (250000). CCALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.15 vs. NRGSX (-3.03). CCALX return over 5 years is better than : -15.37 vs. NRGSX (-20.50).
| CCALX | NRGSX | CCALX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.74 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.564 | 9.900 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 7.49B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.15 | -3.03 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.28 | 1.88 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.37 | -20.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | 14.17 | 698% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement