Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAOX vs FCMAX
CCAOX vs FCMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCAOX vs FCMAX
CCAOX vs FCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAOX vs. FCMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAOX is a Hold and FCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. CCAOX (306M). CCAOX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: CCAOX (3.05) vs FCMAX (2.70). CCAOX was incepted earlier than FCMAX: CCAOX (29 years) vs FCMAX (24 years). CCAOX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FCMAX (0.76). CCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAOX: FCMAX (0) vs CCAOX (2000). CCAOX (6.78) and FCMAX (6.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.99 vs. CCAOX (-3.37).
| CCAOX | FCMAX | CCAOX / FCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.76 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.76 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.643 | 0.962 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 1.87B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 2.70 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.56 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 11.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.37 | 2.99 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | 17.00 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers