Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAOX vs FKTFX
CCAOX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCAOX vs FKTFX
CCAOX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAOX vs. FKTFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAOX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. CCAOX (306M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than CCAOX: FKTFX (3.77) vs CCAOX (3.05). CCAOX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: CCAOX (29 years) vs FKTFX (49 years). CCAOX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). CCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FKTFX (11.93). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAOX: FKTFX (1000) vs CCAOX (2000). FKTFX (7.05) and CCAOX (6.78) have marching annual gain over last year. FKTFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.92 vs. CCAOX (-3.37).
| CCAOX | FKTFX | CCAOX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.60 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.60 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.643 | 1.583 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 13.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 3.77 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 7.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 11.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.37 | -0.92 | 365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | 5.14 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers