Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCASX vs NRGSX
CCASX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CCASX vs NRGSX
CCASX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCASX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCASX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. CCASX (1.4B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CCASX: NRGSX (0.44) vs CCASX (0.00). CCASX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CCASX (24 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). CCASX (1.46) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCASX (17.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCASX: NRGSX (0) vs CCASX (2500). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.64 vs. CCASX (-11.00). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -23.25 vs. CCASX (-26.66).
| CCASX | NRGSX | CCASX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.74 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.74 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.200 | 11.425 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 7B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.00 | -6.64 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.69 | 2.57 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.66 | -23.25 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.87 | 10.05 | 675% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement