Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FCMAX
CCAZX vs FCMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FCMAX
CCAZX vs FCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 300.93M to 1.84B. FCMAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 1.84B. The lowest valued company is CCAZX at 300.93M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2%. FCMAX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while CCAZX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
CCAZX vs. FCMAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. CCAZX (301M). CCAZX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: CCAZX (3.80) vs FCMAX (2.79). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FCMAX: CCAZX (21 years) vs FCMAX (24 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.59). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCMAX (19.00). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FCMAX (0) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. FCMAX (2.78). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. CCAZX (-1.87).
| CCAZX | FCMAX | CCAZX / FCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.76 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.76 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.074 | -1.105 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 1.84B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 2.79 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 2.78 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 9.72 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | 0.78 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | 13.73 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement