Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FCQAX
CCAZX vs FCQAX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FCQAX
CCAZX vs FCQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FCQAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FCQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. CCAZX (306M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than CCAZX: FCQAX (4.16) vs CCAZX (3.75). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FCQAX: CCAZX (21 years) vs FCQAX (8 years). FCQAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than CCAZX (0.59). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: FCQAX (1000) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX (7.53) and FCQAX (7.27) have marching annual gain over last year. CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.10 vs. FCQAX (-1.69).
| CCAZX | FCQAX | CCAZX / FCQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.80 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.939 | 1.946 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 3.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 4.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.03 | 12.94 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.10 | -1.69 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement