Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FKTQX
CCAZX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FKTQX
CCAZX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FKTQX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. CCAZX (301M). FKTQX pays higher dividends than CCAZX: FKTQX (4.02) vs CCAZX (3.80). CCAZX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: CCAZX (21 years) vs FKTQX (9 years). CCAZX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FKTQX (11.93). CCAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: CCAZX (2000) vs FKTQX (1000000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. FKTQX (4.35). CCAZX (-1.87) and FKTQX (-1.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCAZX | FKTQX | CCAZX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.48 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.074 | -0.059 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 12.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 4.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 4.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 11.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | -1.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers