Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs MSODX
CCAZX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs MSODX
CCAZX vs MSODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. MSODX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSODX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CCAZX (301M). CCAZX (3.80) and MSODX (3.64) have matching dividends . CCAZX was incepted earlier than MSODX: CCAZX (21 years) vs MSODX (7 years). CCAZX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. CCAZX (20.00). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCAZX: MSODX (0) vs CCAZX (2000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. MSODX (4.20). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 1.08 vs. CCAZX (-1.87).
| CCAZX | MSODX | CCAZX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.48 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.074 | -0.026 | 284% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 1.28B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 3.64 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 4.20 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 10.81 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | 1.08 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement