Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCFYX vs SKNRX
CCFYX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts CCFYX vs SKNRX
CCFYX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCFYX vs. SKNRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCFYX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 807M vs. CCFYX (479M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than CCFYX: SKNRX (5.47) vs CCFYX (2.33). CCFYX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: CCFYX (12 years) vs SKNRX (21 years). SKNRX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CCFYX (0.70). CCFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. SKNRX (85.00). SKNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCFYX: SKNRX (1000) vs CCFYX (1000000). CCFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.04 vs. SKNRX (16.63). CCFYX return over 5 years is better than : 76.92 vs. SKNRX (40.78).
| CCFYX | SKNRX | CCFYX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.157 | 12.308 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 807M | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 5.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.04 | 16.63 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.97 | 26.94 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.92 | 40.78 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.73 | 53.13 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers