Ad is loading...
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.01M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$58.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGEX (131M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. CCGEX (-3.44). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. CCGEX (32.15).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.020 | 1.824 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 4.52 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.47 | 25.31 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 40.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.40 | 54.91 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...