Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$15.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.39M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$66.92
Change+$0.24 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CCGEX (158M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. CCGEX (5.55). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.91 vs. CCGEX (23.10).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.882 | 16.921 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 9.98 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.80 | 59.12 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 31.91 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.35 | 91.71 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement