Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.96M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a StrongBuy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGEX (154M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. CCGEX (4.43). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.31 vs. CCGEX (21.93).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.667 | 14.852 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 12.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 31.33 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.93 | 32.31 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.09 | 77.12 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement