Ad is loading...
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$11.53
Change+$0.08 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.71M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$53.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.19B
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. CCGEX (120M). CCGEX (0.00) and RNPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. CCGEX (-8.42). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.95 vs. CCGEX (26.56).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.49 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.569 | -5.944 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.42 | -0.02 | 45,160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.13 | 1.44 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.56 | 33.95 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.78 | 45.01 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...