Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPAX
CCGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CCGEX (195M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPAX (0.37) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). CCGEX (2.25) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. CCGEX (-0.86). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.01 vs. CCGEX (-4.99).
| CCGEX | RNPAX | CCGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.49 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.49 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.227 | 4.905 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 195M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | 6.13 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.04 | 29.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.99 | 8.01 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.64 | 95.18 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers