Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$25.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.24M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$62.48
Change-$0.24 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. CCGIX (405M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.27) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. NPFCX (8.14). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.64 vs. NPFCX (37.84).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.295 | 8.325 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 405M | 150B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 8.14 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 26.55 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.64 | 37.84 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement