Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$28.36
Change-$0.24 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.57M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.69
Change-$0.39 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. CCGIX (451M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.25) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.66 vs. NPFCX (12.74). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 62.79 vs. NPFCX (31.00).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.033 | 18.636 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.66 | 12.74 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.70 | 60.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.79 | 31.00 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement