Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.08
Change+$0.15 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.9M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$65.30
Change+$0.41 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGIX (412M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.27) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. CCGIX (9.41). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. NPFCX (35.32).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 12.781 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 412M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 10.53 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.68 | 43.48 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | 35.32 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement