Ad is loading...
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$22.62
Change+$1.54 (+7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets333.25M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$54.57
Change+$3.98 (+7.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CCGIX (333M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.29) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.88). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.16 vs. NPFCX (-10.63). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.04 vs. NPFCX (30.30).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.48 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.791 | -12.625 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.16 | -10.63 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | -7.88 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.04 | 30.30 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers