Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.81
Change-$0.11 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.49M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGIX (426M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGIX (0.27) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. NPFCX (10.56). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.83 vs. NPFCX (25.82).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.48 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.923 | 14.663 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.20 | 10.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 39.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.83 | 25.82 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.49 | - |