Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CCGIX (444M). NPFCX (0.33) and CCGIX (0.32) have matching dividends . CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.84). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGIX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. CCGIX (10.44). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. NPFCX (12.94).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.179 | 6.243 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.33 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 11.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.42 | 34.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 12.94 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 193.59 | 104.50 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement