Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. CCGIX (460M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CCGIX (0.30). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.84). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGIX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.57 vs. NPFCX (7.64). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.52 vs. NPFCX (10.82).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.854 | 7.617 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 460M | 166B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 7.64 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.66 | 39.60 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.52 | 10.82 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.04 | 96.85 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement