Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Hold and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CCGIX (433M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CCGIX (0.29). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.84). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGIX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.40 vs. NPFCX (2.83). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.84 vs. NPFCX (6.04).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.427 | 6.030 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | 2.83 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.24 | 35.62 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.84 | 6.04 | 494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.10 | 98.13 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement