Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs NPFCX
CCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CCGIX (446M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CCGIX (0.30). CCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGIX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.84). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGIX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. NPFCX (5.55). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 35.64 vs. NPFCX (7.57).
| CCGIX | NPFCX | CCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.605 | 4.473 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.14 | 5.55 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.70 | 29.60 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.64 | 7.57 | 471% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.61 | 93.90 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement