Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets409.39M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.55
Change+$0.36 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.58B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. CCGSX (409M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.49) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPAX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. CCGSX (8.90). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.67 vs. CNPAX (45.87).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.126 | 12.322 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 155B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.49 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.90 | 11.48 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.99 | 46.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.67 | 45.87 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers