Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.38M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.74
Change-$0.56 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.68B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. CCGSX (413M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.48) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPAX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX (19.02) and CNPAX (18.93) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 56.48 vs. CNPAX (35.85).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.111 | 12.633 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 413M | 157B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.48 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.02 | 18.93 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.24 | 36.08 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.48 | 35.85 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement