Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.84M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.07
Change-$0.24 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. CCGSX (406M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.51) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPAX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPAX (9.15) and CCGSX (8.89) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.41 vs. CNPAX (44.34).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.183 | 8.651 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.51 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 9.15 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.31 | 30.04 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.41 | 44.34 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement