Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.96
Change-$0.23 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.57M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and CNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. CCGSX (451M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (9 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. CNPAX (13.83). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.69 vs. CNPAX (37.19).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.77 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.780 | 19.302 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 451M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.46 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.31 | 13.83 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.27 | 64.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.69 | 37.19 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement