Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CCGSX (446M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.97) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. CNPAX (6.66). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.81 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.408 | 4.921 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 6.66 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.51 | 33.46 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.81 | 12.85 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.40 | 113.25 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers