Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CCGSX (435M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPAX (24 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. CCGSX (6.33). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.36 vs. CNPAX (14.59).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.312 | 3.420 | -68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 8.94 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.16 | 38.73 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.36 | 14.59 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 117.66 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement