Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPAX
CCGSX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and CNPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CCGSX (433M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPAX (25 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPAX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. CNPAX (3.90). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. CNPAX (11.24).
| CCGSX | CNPAX | CCGSX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.263 | 6.566 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 3.90 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.05 | 39.63 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | 11.24 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.38 | 117.91 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers