Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs CNPFX
CCGSX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. CNPFX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and CNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CCGSX (435M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: CNPFX (1.12) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs CNPFX (24 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: CNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CCGSX (6.33). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.36 vs. CNPFX (15.42).
| CCGSX | CNPFX | CCGSX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.83 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.312 | 3.483 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 9.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.16 | 39.33 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.36 | 15.42 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 121.54 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement