Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.93
Change-$0.37 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$60.09
Change-$0.87 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (374M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.20) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.18 vs. NPFCX (16.91). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.81 vs. NPFCX (34.96).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.074 | 14.719 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.18 | 16.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.05 | -12.05 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.81 | 34.96 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.19 | - |