Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.48
Change+$0.43 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.16M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$56.83
Change+$1.08 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCGSX (370M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.17) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.13). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. NPFCX (3.21). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.49 vs. NPFCX (41.75).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.48 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.243 | -1.848 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 370M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 3.21 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.56 | 9.15 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.49 | 41.75 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...