Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$22.89
Change-$0.84 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets376.65M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.04
Change-$2.29 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. CCGSX (377M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.17) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.13). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. NPFCX (1.31). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 102.49 vs. NPFCX (62.26).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.48 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.671 | -0.984 | -170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 1.31 | 538% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.15 | 0.31 | 4,956% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.49 | 62.26 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...