Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.97
Change-$0.19 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.22M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$60.51
Change-$0.74 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.51B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. CCGSX (393M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.20) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. NPFCX (9.30). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.26 vs. NPFCX (28.75).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.984 | 4.508 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 9.30 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.91 | 12.03 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.26 | 28.75 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...