Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$61.41
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. CCGSX (384M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.20) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.66 vs. NPFCX (22.26). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 84.81 vs. NPFCX (43.13).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.716 | 16.781 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 145B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.66 | 22.26 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.11 | -6.18 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.81 | 43.13 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers