Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.77
Change+$0.13 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.4M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$59.08
Change+$0.38 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.81B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. CCGSX (374M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.20) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.24 vs. NPFCX (14.21). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.61 vs. NPFCX (26.62).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.842 | 2.038 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 145B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.24 | 14.21 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.57 | 0.17 | 7,510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.61 | 26.62 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...