Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.46
Change-$0.26 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets441.05M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.08
Change-$0.59 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CCGSX (441M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.15) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.11). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. NPFCX (11.06). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. NPFCX (21.99).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.48 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.766 | 15.855 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.37 | 11.06 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 43.28 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 21.99 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement