Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.74
Change-$0.66 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$61.25
Change-$1.94 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. CCGSX (384M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.20) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX (21.78) and NPFCX (21.29) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.67 vs. NPFCX (40.51).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.374 | 20.638 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 149B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.78 | 21.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | 5.32 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.67 | 40.51 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...