Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.15
Change-$0.14 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets406.43M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$62.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.07B
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. CCGSX (406M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: CCGSX (0.16) vs NPFCX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.11). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. NPFCX (6.99). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.63 vs. NPFCX (38.08).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.48 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.355 | 8.083 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 150B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 6.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.69 | 40.90 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.63 | 38.08 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement