Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CCGSX (450M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.09). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. NPFCX (7.02). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 31.58 vs. NPFCX (9.04).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.47 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.529 | 5.404 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 7.02 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.33 | 36.01 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.58 | 9.04 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.23 | 101.88 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement