Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFCX
CCGSX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CCGSX (433M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs CCGSX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CCGSX (10 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.09). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFCX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. NPFCX (2.83). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. NPFCX (6.04).
| CCGSX | NPFCX | CCGSX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.47 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.47 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.263 | 6.030 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 2.83 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.05 | 35.62 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | 6.04 | 466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.38 | 98.13 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement