Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs FBGTX
CCGTX vs FBGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. FBGTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and FBGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (46.4B) and FBGTX (46.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBGTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: FBGTX (1.44) vs CCGTX (0.53). CCGTX was incepted earlier than FBGTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs FBGTX (11 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). CCGTX (6.00) and FBGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and FBGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. CCGTX (9.71). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.02 vs. CCGTX (35.98).
| CCGTX | FBGTX | CCGTX / FBGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.44 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.44 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.372 | 6.761 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 46.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.44 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 10.80 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.87 | 25.61 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.98 | 41.02 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.60 | 70.60 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement