Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs JLIIX
CCGTX vs JLIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. JLIIX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and JLIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. JLIIX (965M). JLIIX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: JLIIX (2.08) vs CCGTX (0.50). CCGTX was incepted earlier than JLIIX: CCGTX (12 years) vs JLIIX (14 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than JLIIX (0.90). JLIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGTX (6.00). CCGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLIIX: CCGTX (250) vs JLIIX (1000000). CCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. JLIIX (14.47). CCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.18 vs. JLIIX (15.98).
| CCGTX | JLIIX | CCGTX / JLIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.58 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.90 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.300 | 12.441 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 965M | 5,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 2.08 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | 14.47 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.37 | 16.68 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.18 | 15.98 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.07 | 22.60 | 376% |