Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs LEKAX
CCGTX vs LEKAX Comparison
Open Charts CCGTX vs LEKAX
CCGTX vs LEKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. LEKAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and LEKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX has more cash in the bank: 53.3B vs. LEKAX (32.6M). LEKAX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: LEKAX (1.50) vs CCGTX (0.18). CCGTX was incepted earlier than LEKAX: CCGTX (13 years) vs LEKAX (6 years). CCGTX (1.44) is less costly to investors than LEKAX (0.86). LEKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. CCGTX (10.00). CCGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEKAX: CCGTX (250) vs LEKAX (1000). LEKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.91 vs. CCGTX (9.76). LEKAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.84 vs. CCGTX (21.25).
| CCGTX | LEKAX | CCGTX / LEKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.50 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.86 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.651 | 11.202 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.3B | 32.6M | 163,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.50 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 16.91 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.91 | 54.56 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.25 | 39.84 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement