CCI
Price
$88.52
Change
-$0.23 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.73B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBAC
Price
$196.17
Change
+$0.35 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.77B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCI vs SBAC

Header iconCCI vs SBAC Comparison
Open Charts CCI vs SBACBanner chart's image
CCI vs SBAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crown Castle (CCI) vs. SBA Communications (SBAC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CCI and SBAC are leading real estate investment trusts (REITs) focused on wireless communications infrastructure, benefiting from long-term leasing to major carriers.
  • SBAC has shown stronger recent momentum, with year-to-date gains of 13.3% compared to CCI's 1.8%, fueled by buyout speculation and an 18.9% single-session surge.
  • CCI reported a Q1 2026 net income recovery to $151 million on $1.01 billion revenue, alongside adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) beats, amid plans to divest non-core fiber assets.
  • CCI offers a higher dividend yield of nearly 5%, appealing to income-focused investors, while SBAC's yield stands at 2.3%.
  • SBAC exhibits positive quarterly revenue growth of 3.7% year-over-year, contrasting CCI's -4.8%.
  • Tickeron's AI models favor SBAC for near-term outperformance based on momentum.

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of wireless infrastructure, CCI and SBAC stand out as premier REITs owning extensive portfolios of cell towers essential for 5G deployment and carrier networks. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent market performance, and key metrics to aid investors seeking exposure to telecommunications real estate. Traders monitoring REIT sector trends, dividend yields, or growth catalysts in infrastructure will find value in understanding their relative positioning amid interest rate sensitivity and consolidation rumors. With both stocks navigating macroeconomic pressures, insights into momentum and fundamentals highlight trade-offs for portfolio allocation.

CCI Overview and Recent Performance

Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) operates one of the largest shared communications infrastructure portfolios in the U.S., including approximately 40,000 cell towers. As a REIT, it generates stable revenue through long-term leases to wireless carriers. In recent market activity, CCI has traded around $86, within a 52-week range of $76 to $116, reflecting volatility tied to interest rates and tenant churn. Q1 2026 results marked a turnaround with $1.01 billion in revenue and $151 million net income, beating AFFO expectations despite DISH-related headwinds. The company is advancing divestitures of its fiber and small-cell businesses to streamline operations, reduce debt nearing $30 billion, and prioritize core tower assets. Year-to-date gains of 1.8% lag broader indices, but strategic focus has supported modest recovery in recent weeks, bolstering sentiment among value-oriented investors.

SBAC Overview and Recent Performance

SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is a leading owner and operator of wireless infrastructure across the Americas, with a portfolio emphasizing towers in the U.S. and Latin America. Its REIT structure ensures predictable cash flows from multi-tenant sites leased to carriers. Recently, SBAC has traded near $218, in a 52-week range of $162 to $245, buoyed by sector tailwinds. A notable 18.9% stock surge in recent weeks stemmed from buyout speculation, driving year-to-date returns to 13.3%. Positive quarterly revenue growth of 3.7% year-over-year underscores leasing demand, though AFFO faces pressure ahead of Q1 2026 earnings. Analyst upgrades, including targets up to $247, reflect optimism on expansion and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) potential, enhancing market sentiment despite broader REIT challenges.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—such as AI infrastructure, semiconductors, and volatility plays—earn a spot among the 25 featured out of 351 total bots. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +164.57%, win rates ranging from 51% to 88%, and timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, often using take-profit/stop-loss corridors like 3%/2%. Short-term swing bots on ETFs show +97% returns, while sector specialists in data centers exceed +86%. Traders can copy real-time signals for stocks, ETFs, or crypto via integrated brokerages. Explore these high-conviction tools to align with prevailing trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CCI and SBAC share tower-centric business models reliant on carrier leasing, but CCI emphasizes U.S.-only scale with a larger $37.6 billion market cap, while SBAC diversifies via Latin America for growth upside. Recent momentum favors SBAC amid buyout buzz, contrasting CCI's steadier post-earnings path. Risk factors include high debt loads ($30B for CCI) and interest sensitivity, with SBAC showing lower beta (0.88). CCI boasts superior dividend yield (4.9%) and profitability margins, but SBAC's lower P/E (22 vs. 36) and revenue growth signal better valuation. Sector exposure ties both to 5G, yet SBAC's international footprint offers differentiation amid U.S. churn.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor SBAC over CCI for near-term potential, citing superior momentum, 13% YTD gains versus 2%, and positive analyst revisions amid consolidation themes. While CCI excels in dividend stability and long-term buy ratings, SBAC's catalysts like buyout interest and lower volatility position it probabilistically stronger in recent trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CCI vs. SBAC commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCI is a Buy and SBAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CCI: $88.74 vs. SBAC: $195.82)
Brand notoriety: CCI and SBAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCI: 162% vs. SBAC: 280%
Market capitalization -- CCI: $38.73B vs. SBAC: $20.77B
CCI [@Specialty Telecommunications] is valued at $38.73B. SBAC’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $20.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $104.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $22.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCI is a better buy in the long-term than SBAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCI is a better buy in the short-term than SBAC.

Price Growth

CCI (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while SBAC (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCI is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

SBAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Telecommunications (+1.01% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCI($38.7B) has a higher market cap than SBAC($20.8B). CCI has higher P/E ratio than SBAC: CCI (37.44) vs SBAC (20.61). SBAC YTD gains are higher at: 2.541 vs. CCI (2.280). CCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.69B vs. SBAC (2.02B). SBAC has less debt than CCI: SBAC (15.4B) vs CCI (29.9B). CCI has higher revenues than SBAC: CCI (4.21B) vs SBAC (2.85B).
CCISBACCCI / SBAC
Capitalization38.7B20.8B186%
EBITDA2.69B2.02B133%
Gain YTD2.2802.54190%
P/E Ratio37.4420.61182%
Revenue4.21B2.85B148%
Total CashN/A381M-
Total Debt29.9B15.4B194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCI vs SBAC: Fundamental Ratings
CCI
SBAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4583
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCI's Valuation (27) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SBAC (44). This means that CCI’s stock grew similarly to SBAC’s over the last 12 months.

CCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SBAC (100). This means that CCI’s stock grew similarly to SBAC’s over the last 12 months.

SBAC's SMR Rating (99) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CCI (100). This means that SBAC’s stock grew similarly to CCI’s over the last 12 months.

SBAC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CCI (52). This means that SBAC’s stock grew similarly to CCI’s over the last 12 months.

CCI's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBAC (83). This means that CCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCISBAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRE3.240.30
+10.20%
Cre8 Enterprise Ltd
ENGN1.770.15
+9.26%
enGene Therapeutics Inc
FWONA83.261.27
+1.55%
Liberty Media Corp
HRTG22.30-0.15
-0.67%
Heritage Insurance Holdings
GBDC12.72-0.24
-1.85%
Golub Capital BDC