Ad is loading...
CCJTX vs RFKTX
CCJTX vs RFKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCJTX vs. RFKTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJTX is a Hold and RFKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJTX (24.3B) and RFKTX (24.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFKTX pays higher dividends than CCJTX: RFKTX (1.23) vs CCJTX (0.22). CCJTX was incepted earlier than RFKTX: CCJTX (11 years) vs RFKTX (15 years). CCJTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RFKTX (0.39). CCJTX (5.00) and RFKTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCJTX (250) and RFKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. CCJTX (4.94). RFKTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.59 vs. CCJTX (39.59).
| CCJTX | RFKTX | CCJTX / RFKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.39 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.39 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.376 | -1.022 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 24.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.23 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 6.18 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 19.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.59 | 45.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.24 | 65.28 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...