Advertisement
CCL vs LIND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCL is a StrongBuy and LIND is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIND’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- LIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -4.34% price change this week, while LIND (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCL is expected to report earnings on Jun 30, 2026.
LIND is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (+0.24% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| CCL | LIND | CCL / LIND | |
| Capitalization | 36B | 1.44B | 2,505% |
| EBITDA | 7.22B | 95M | 7,595% |
| Gain YTD | -13.981 | 51.872 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.45 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 27B | 799M | 3,379% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 275M | - |
| Total Debt | 26.6B | 665M | 4,000% |
CCL | LIND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCL's Valuation (31) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (95) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's SMR Rating (35) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.
| CCL | LIND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 14 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RMNY | 24.59 | -0.04 | -0.18% |
| Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| PSCD | 111.28 | -0.29 | -0.26% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF | |||
| CZA | 118.37 | -1.01 | -0.85% |
| Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| XLSR | 63.24 | -1.11 | -1.73% |
| State Street® US Sector Rotation ETF | |||
| ONDG | 4.40 | -0.28 | -5.98% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF | |||
CCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL | 100% | -6.27% | ||
| CUK - CCL | 92% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NCLH - CCL | 82% Closely correlated | -5.83% | ||
| VIK - CCL | 80% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| RCL - CCL | 79% Closely correlated | -4.79% | ||
| LIND - CCL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
More | ||||