LIND
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.20 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.68B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNL
Price
$75.58
Change
+$0.88 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.66B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs TNL

LIND vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. TNL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and TNL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LIND: $25.54 vs. TNL: $74.70)
Brand notoriety: LIND and TNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 82% vs. TNL: 58%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $1.68B vs. TNL: $4.66B
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.68B. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $4.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $130B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $25.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +6.55% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

TNL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-1.92% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($4.66B) has a higher market cap than LIND($1.68B). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 77.115 vs. TNL (7.701). TNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 701M vs. LIND (95M). LIND has less debt than TNL: LIND (665M) vs TNL (5.75B). TNL has higher revenues than LIND: TNL (4.05B) vs LIND (799M).
LINDTNLLIND / TNL
Capitalization1.68B4.66B36%
EBITDA95M701M14%
Gain YTD77.1157.7011,001%
P/E RatioN/A20.81-
Revenue799M4.05B20%
Total Cash275MN/A-
Total Debt665M5.75B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6054
SMR RATING
1..100
1003
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
978
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TNL (41) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FJUL59.380.02
+0.03%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jul
MBSF25.75N/A
+0.02%
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
LOTI25.61-0.18
-0.69%
Liberty One Tactical Income ETF
PYPG4.96-0.04
-0.74%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF
DUG20.72-0.56
-2.63%
ProShares UltraShort Energy

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-0.82%
VIK - LIND
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
CCL - LIND
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
NCLH - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
RCL - LIND
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
TNL - LIND
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More