Advertisement
LIND vs TNL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and TNL is a Hold.
| LIND | TNL | LIND / TNL | |
| Capitalization | 1.81B | 3.87B | 47% |
| EBITDA | 105M | 706M | 15% |
| Gain YTD | 90.985 | -8.108 | -1,122% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.83 | 17.07 | 140% |
| Revenue | 831M | 4.09B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 319M | 282M | 113% |
| Total Debt | 666M | 5.71B | 12% |
LIND | TNL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNL's Valuation (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TNL (47) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TNL (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.
TNL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
| LIND | TNL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TNL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +7.28% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIND is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
TNL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-0.39% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EEMX | 53.19 | 0.23 | +0.44% |
| State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EEMX) | |||
| BLCR | 48.95 | 0.12 | +0.25% |
| iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF (BLCR) | |||
| ACTS | 25.22 | N/A | N/A |
| FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) | |||
| ARLU | 32.28 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) | |||
| HQL | 19.41 | -0.16 | -0.82% |
| abrdn Life Sciences Investors | |||
LIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| VIK - LIND | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| NCLH - LIND | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| TNL - LIND | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| PRSU - LIND | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| BFAM - LIND | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More | ||||
TNL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| CCL - TNL | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| SABR - TNL | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| NCLH - TNL | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| RCL - TNL | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| LIND - TNL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||