Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCQYX vs RWMFX
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst3
Price$16.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCQYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCQYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. CCQYX (4.9B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCQYX: RWMFX (1.41) vs CCQYX (0.78). CCQYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCQYX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCQYX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCQYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCQYX: RWMFX (250) vs CCQYX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. CCQYX (-2.74). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. CCQYX (31.23).
| CCQYX | RWMFX | CCQYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.140 | 8.905 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.41 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.74 | 4.59 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.61 | 29.92 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.23 | 45.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.18 | 72.75 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers