Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCQYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCQYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CCQYX (5.08B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCQYX: RWMFX (1.40) vs CCQYX (0.72). CCQYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCQYX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCQYX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCQYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCQYX: RWMFX (250) vs CCQYX (1000000). CCQYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. RWMFX (8.15). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. CCQYX (12.95).
| CCQYX | RWMFX | CCQYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.082 | 1.616 | 376% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.08B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.40 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 8.15 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.06 | 30.58 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | 27.55 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.15 | 82.86 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement