Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCQYX vs RWMFX
CCQYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCQYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCQYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CCQYX (5.17B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCQYX: RWMFX (1.41) vs CCQYX (0.70). CCQYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCQYX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCQYX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCQYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCQYX: RWMFX (250) vs CCQYX (1000000). CCQYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. CCQYX (9.90).
| CCQYX | RWMFX | CCQYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.137 | 4.508 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 2.09 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.77 | 30.24 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.90 | 27.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | 82.36 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement