Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSAX vs SKNRX
CCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts CCSAX vs SKNRX
CCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSAX vs. SKNRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSAX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 811M vs. CCSAX (428M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than CCSAX: SKNRX (6.16) vs CCSAX (2.28). CCSAX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: CCSAX (14 years) vs SKNRX (21 years). SKNRX (1.40) is less costly to investors than CCSAX (1.11). CCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. SKNRX (85.00). CCSAX (6%) and SKNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SKNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSAX: SKNRX (1000) vs CCSAX (2000). CCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.65 vs. SKNRX (21.97). CCSAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.06 vs. SKNRX (36.83).
| CCSAX | SKNRX | CCSAX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.10 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.302 | 13.829 | 197% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 428M | 811M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 6.16 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.65 | 21.97 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | 25.34 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.06 | 36.83 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.54 | 64.12 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement