Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSAX vs SKNRX
CCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts CCSAX vs SKNRX
CCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSAX vs. SKNRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSAX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 847M vs. CCSAX (468M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than CCSAX: SKNRX (6.16) vs CCSAX (2.28). CCSAX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: CCSAX (14 years) vs SKNRX (22 years). SKNRX (1.40) is less costly to investors than CCSAX (1.11). CCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. SKNRX (85.00). CCSAX (6%) and SKNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SKNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSAX: SKNRX (1000) vs CCSAX (2000). CCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.55 vs. SKNRX (29.46). CCSAX return over 5 years is better than : 93.27 vs. SKNRX (53.96).
| CCSAX | SKNRX | CCSAX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.10 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.047 | 21.031 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 468M | 847M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 6.16 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.55 | 29.46 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.39 | 36.32 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.27 | 53.96 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.80 | 66.37 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers