Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.05
Change+$0.26 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.12M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.57
Change+$1.10 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. CCSGX (651M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.47) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. CCSGX (2.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.70 vs. CCSGX (39.71).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.04 | 2,914% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.790 | 5.161 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 39.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 12.57 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.82 | 54.50 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.71 | 59.70 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.06 | 80.30 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement