Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.22M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$90.60
Change+$1.13 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. CCSGX (657M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSGX (9.00) and FSMAX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. CCSGX (10.06). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.39 vs. CCSGX (40.12).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.04 | 2,914% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.714 | -1.551 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 37.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 11.97 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 30.47 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 51.39 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.68 | 69.53 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement