Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.19
Change-$0.32 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets625.08M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.10
Change-$0.92 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CCSGX (625M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. CCSGX (-2.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.98 vs. CCSGX (34.76).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.04 | 2,914% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.856 | 11.158 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 41B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 17.75 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.31 | 72.28 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.76 | 63.98 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.01 | 117.37 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement