Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.69
Change+$0.23 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.3M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. CCSGX (645M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CCSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. CCSGX (9.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. CCSGX (46.74).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.04 | 2,914% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.046 | 0.044 | -6,921% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 37.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 14.57 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 43.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.74 | 64.38 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.88 | 73.79 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement