Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CCSGX (483M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSGX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. CCSGX (-10.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. CCSGX (-5.56).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.04 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | 14.890 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 42.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | 30.08 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.31 | 73.38 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.56 | 37.47 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 143.95 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement