Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CCSGX (454M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (12 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSGX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. CCSGX (-12.06). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. CCSGX (-9.58).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.04 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.894 | 15.913 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 43.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.06 | 24.38 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.97 | 63.28 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.58 | 39.12 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.57 | 139.20 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers