Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs FSMAX
CCSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CCSGX (409M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CCSGX (12 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CCSGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCSGX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: FSMAX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. CCSGX (-12.63). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CCSGX (-14.71).
| CCSGX | FSMAX | CCSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.04 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.007 | 13.370 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.63 | 20.57 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.27 | 55.83 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.71 | 33.18 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.54 | 133.82 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers